Officials: California governor delays execution by 45 hours to allow time for appeal by inmateBy Paul Elias, AP
Monday, September 27, 2010
CA gov delays execution to allow review of appeal
SAN FRANCISCO — California’s first execution in nearly five years was pushed back almost two days Monday by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to provide more time for the state Supreme Court to consider an appeal by the condemned inmate.
Albert Greenwood Brown is now scheduled to die by lethal injection at 9 p.m. Thursday, said Terry Thornton, spokeswoman for the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Brown initially was scheduled for execution at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday.
Brown’s attorneys have filed simultaneous appeals in federal and state courts, claiming California improperly adopted its new lethal injection procedures. They also allege that execution under the new regulations would amount to cruel and unusual punishment.
The 45-hour reprieve pushes the execution to within hours of the Friday expiration date on the state’s supply of sodium thiopental, one of the drugs used in the lethal injection process.
Hospira, the only company in the country that makes the drug, said it has production problems and can’t deliver any new shipments until early next year. Several other states have rescheduled executions because of the drug shortage.
The company has also told prison officials across the country, “we do not support the use of any of our products in capital punishment procedures.”
The California attorney general’s office said Monday it would recommend not scheduling any more executions after Thursday until the state can secure a fresh supply of the drug, an anesthetic that renders condemned inmates unconscious before lethal drugs are injected.
Lawyers in the attorney general’s office said in August that execution dates would be aggressively pursued for four other inmates who, like Brown, had completed the federal and state appeals process. But that was before the California shortage was disclosed in a court filing Saturday.
Already, prosecutors have canceled a planned Sept. 14 court hearing to set an execution date for Michael Morales, who came within two hours of execution in February 2006 before prison officials canceled his lethal injection and moved to comply with a federal judge’s order to overhaul the state’s capital punishment system.
Three other death row inmates — Kevin Cooper, David Raley and Mitchell Sims — may have also benefited from the shortage because they were on the short list of execution candidates.
Sodium thiopental would be the first drug administered to Brown, who is to receive two shots each of 1.5 grams of the sedative. If the warden determines Brown is still awake, he would receive two more shots of 1.5 grams, according to the state’s regulations. Once he’s unconsciousness, Brown would be injected with pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride, which should prove fatal.
Brown’s attorneys argue that the process puts the inmate at risk of suffering extreme pain. They also argue the regulations were drafted improperly and ignored the many public comments warning about the perils of the three-drug cocktail.
On Monday, Brown asked Marin County Superior Court Judge Verna Adams to halt his execution until a lawsuit he filed with another death row inmate is resolved. The suit challenges the lethal injection regulations
California deputy attorney general Jay Goldman told the judge the regulations were adopted legally after a lengthy process that included public input.
Adams said she would not halt Brown’s execution.
“Mr. Brown cannot prove that he will suffer pain if he is executed under the current regulations,” Adams said.
Corrections officials revised the procedures after a federal judge halted the death penalty in California in 2006 amid concerns that its method of lethal injection was a form of cruel and unusual punishment.
Brown was convicted of abducting, raping and killing a 15-year-old girl on her way home from school in 1980.
Associated Press Writer Terry Collins in San Rafael, Calif., contributed to this report.
Tags: California, Criminal Punishment, National Courts, North America, San Francisco, United States