US Customs says Mexican cartels infiltrate border agency; few new hires take polygraph tests

US Customs: Mexican cartels corrupt border agents

McALLEN, Texas — Mexican drug cartels are infiltrating federal law enforcement agencies along the southwest border and those charged with weeding them out say they don’t have the money to catch all the corrupt agents, homeland security officials told a U.S. Senate panel Thursday.

James Tomsheck, assistant commissioner with U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Internal Affairs, told a Senate homeland security subcommittee in Washington that only about one in 10 of the new hires for agency jobs are given polygraph tests, and of those, 60 percent are deemed unsuitable for employment.

That means that many who joined the agency during the recent hiring boom and did not take polygraphs could have joined with corruption already in mind, Tomsheck said.

“That 60 percent number is alarming to me,” said U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., who chaired the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs’ Subcommittee on State, Local, and Private Sector Preparedness and Integration.

The Associated Press reported last year that four applicants for border protection jobs were not hired when polygraph tests and background checks confirmed they were infiltrators from drug trafficking operations.

“Transnational criminal organizations are doing all they can to infiltrate CBP through our hiring initiatives,” Tomsheck told the subcommittee.

An AP investigation tallied corruption-related convictions against more than 80 enforcement officials at all levels — federal, state and local — along the southwest border since 2007.

Since 2003, 129 customs officers and Border Patrol agents have been arrested on corruption charges, said Tom Frost, the Department of Homeland Security’s assistant inspector general for investigations. That figure included the northern border and other ports of entry.

“We have found the tactics used by the drug trafficking organizations in their corruption activities are similar to the processes or tactics used by foreign intelligence services as they attempt to recruit or otherwise compromise our officers and agents,” Frost said. The corruption activities “encompass almost every layer of the DHS border security strategy,” including employees stationed away from the border, but with access to sensitive information.

They have used that access to “to vet drug trafficking organization members, track investigative activity, and identify individuals cooperating with the government,” Frost said.

Kevin Perkins, the FBI’s assistant director for its criminal investigative division, mentioned the case of former Customs officer Margarita Crispin who was arrested in El Paso in 2007 and sentenced to 20 years in prison after pleading guilty to a charge of conspiracy to import more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. Prosecutors alleged she accepted more than $5 million in bribes over several years in exchange for letting smugglers’ vehicles pass through her checkpoint without inspection.

Frost said investigators believed that Crispin, a former El Paso police officer, had been recruited by drug traffickers to join the agency to further the smuggling conspiracy.

Even though CBP has increased its internal affairs investigators to 214 in 2010 from five in 2006, its number of polygraph examiners falls short of the demand, Tomsheck said.

To be able to give polygraphs to all new hires, Tomsheck estimated he would need another 50 full-time examiners.

By the end of the year, the agency will also face the challenge of doing the required five-year re-investigations of 19,000 employees whose evaluations will be overdue. Tomsheck estimated they would be able to do about half of them and noted that for budget reasons they had recently furloughed 99 people with law enforcement backgrounds who did the investigations. He asked Pryor to consider legislation that would give his office the authority to make polygraph tests part of the periodic re-investigations.

He said his goal was to eventually have continuous monitoring, “the never-ending background investigation, if you will.”