Feds charge ex-officer with conspiracy to obstruct justice in Katrina bridge killing probe

Ex-officer charged in Katrina bridge killing probe

NEW ORLEANS — A former police lieutenant knew two people shot to death by police as they crossed a bridge in the chaos after Hurricane Katrina had no weapons, but he and others filed false reports to make the shootings seem justified, according to federal documents unsealed Wednesday.

Former Lt. Michael Lohman knew officers planned to lie and tamper with evidence, federal officials said in a bill of information charging Lohman with conspiracy to obstruct justice.

Lohman also knew another investigator planned to plant a gun to justify the shooting and asked if it was “clean,” meaning it could not be traced back to another crime, according to the documents. The investigator assured him it was and he went along with the plan to plant it.

Lohman was expected to plead guilty Wednesday and cooperate with federal investigators, two people familiar with the case told The Associated Press on Tuesday. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the charge had not been announced.

Seven officers were charged with murder or attempted murder in the Sept. 4, 2005, shootings on the Danziger Bridge, just days after Katrina smashed levees and flooded 80 percent of the city.

Ronald Madison, a 40-year-old mentally disabled man, and 19-year-old James Brissette were killed. Four others were wounded.

Survivors have said the officers fired at unarmed people who were crossing to get food at a grocery store. The officers acknowledged shooting at people on the bridge, but said they did so only after being shot at.

Lohman supervised the initial probe of the officers’ actions. That investigation drew U.S. Justice Department attention after a state judge dismissed the charges against the seven officers in 2008.

Lohman went to the scene of the shootings, saw that the victims had no weapons, and concluded the shooting was unjustified, according to the bill of information. Then he and other unnamed officers conspired to cover that up by filing false statements on a police report about the incident, according to the documents, which does not name the other officers.

The plan was “to ensure that the shootings would appear to be legally justified and that the involved officers would therefore be shielded from prosecution and liability,” the documents said.

A lawyer for one of the officers originally charged in the shootings said federal investigators have been looking into what they described as a “corrupt investigation.”

So far, lawyers for two other officers have identified their clients as targets of the probe.

The documents unsealed Wednesday allege that Lohman and two unidentified sergeants drafted different versions of a false incident report on the bridge shootings in October 2005.

Among claims in the false report was a statement by one of the victims that she had seen her nephew and others firing guns on the bridge.

Federal officials say Lohman drafted his own 17-page false report after becoming dissatisfied that another investigator’s false account was not logical.

“On several occasions in or about October 2005, defendant Lohman reviewed drafts of the false report written by the investigator and counseled the investigator on ways to make the story in the report sound more plausible,” according to court documents.

The documents said Lohman also told the investigator to speak with each of the shooters to ensure they were “OK with” the false report, and were willing to give statements consistent with it.