Atty Gen Holder tells Congress that US still hopes to capture bin Laden alive, interrogate him

Holder says US still hopes to take bin Laden alive

WASHINGTON — Under pressure from Republican critics, Attorney General Eric Holder said Wednesday the U.S. still hopes to capture and interrogate Osama bin Laden but expects the al-Qaida leader won’t be taken alive.

Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the attorney general was peppered with questions about terrorism issues, including the planned shutdown of the Guantanamo Bay detention center and where those suspects should be sent for trial. The hearing didn’t have the confrontations that marked his appearance last month before House lawmakers, however.

During the earlier hearing, questions about what legal rights might be granted to suspected terrorists led Holder to tell lawmakers the chances of capturing the al-Qaida leader alive were very slim and “we will be reading Miranda rights to the corpse of Osama bin Laden.”

On Wednesday Holder again tried to deflect hypothetical questions about what would happen were bin Laden taken alive.

The committee’s senior Republican, Jeff Sessions of Alabama, insisted the U.S. needs a policy on how to handle bin Laden, particularly whether he should be read his Miranda rights — including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

Holder said there would be no need to read bin Laden his rights if captured, because the warning is only legally required to allow the use of incriminating statements made by suspects after they are caught. In bin Laden’s case, Holder said, there is a wealth of incriminating evidence making further statements unnecessary to convict him.

“We have sufficient information, statements from bin Laden, so that there is no reason to Mirandize him at all, and you can still bring his case,” Holder said.

Since the capture and questioning of a Nigerian man charged with trying to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas, many Republicans have argued that terror suspects should not be read their Miranda rights by FBI agents, but instead should be questioned by military or intelligence officials.

The Obama administration contends its policies are more effective in fighting terrorism than those of the Bush administration. Republicans charge that the Democrats are treating terrorists lightly by not subjecting more of them to military trials.

Holder said his remarks last month stemmed from reports that bin Laden’s security guards are under instructions not to let him be taken alive if cornered by U.S. forces.

Shortly after he made those comments in March, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan said it remains the goal of U.S. troops to capture bin Laden alive and bring him to justice.

Bin Laden has been an international fugitive for more than 10 years — yet government officials and lawmakers spent much of Wednesday’s three-hour hearing debating how, not if, he will be captured.

Democratic Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin was unsuccessful in trying to pin Holder down on when the Guantanamo prison would be closed.

Holder said that depends in part on Congress providing money to build another facility. An alternative prison is currently planned for Illinois.

“We have to have an option, and that will require congressional support,” he said.

Holder did get some public support from a longtime critic, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Graham has taken on an important negotiating role with the White House on terror issues, and said at Wednesday’s hearing that he supports putting some terror suspects on trial in federal courts.

The senator got Holder to admit that the administration does not want to send any more terror suspects to Guantanamo. That presents a potential problem in how to deal with terrorists captured overseas.

“We are basically a nation without a viable jail,” said Graham.

Holder said he wants to work with Congress on a new prison, which Graham called “music to my ears.”

While the two stressed the areas where they agreed, Graham is so far the lone Republican willing to deal with the administration on the issue. It is less certain whether the administration can strike any deal on terror policies that has enough votes to pass Congress, particularly in an election year.

Republicans repeatedly pressed Holder over concerns he is risking U.S. security by placing some terror suspects in the federal criminal court system.

“Pretending that terrorists can safely be treated as common criminals will not make it so,” said Sessions.

Holder announced last November that reputed Sept. 11 attack mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four accused co-conspirators would face trial in New York. The White House stopped that effort, and is now preparing to put those suspects before a military commission, as the Bush administration had originally planned.

The attorney general insisted that New York is still a possible site for the terror trial, though White House officials have privately said that won’t happen.

Democrats were quick to defend Holder, saying Republicans were playing politics with terrorism in a way they had not when George W. Bush was president.

“I have never seen anything quite like this,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “The record is ignored. It doesn’t matter that the Bush administration brought 200 terrorists to justice” in federal courts.