Afghan government says donor nations must share blame for corruption, cash trafficking

By Deb Riechmann, AP
Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Afghan leader: Foreign contracts fuel corruption

KABUL, Afghanistan — Afghan President Hamid Karzai and his finance minister pushed back Wednesday against allegations of government corruption, saying that their international partners must shoulder some of the blame for waste, graft and the billions of dollars streaming out of the country.

Corruption and a weak court system have undermined public trust in Karzai’s government. The Obama administration and other donor nations, who need Karzai to be perceived as a credible partner, are pressing him to make reforms. Afghan government officials, however, have become increasingly vocal in condemning the way foreign nations award contracts, which sometimes end up in the hands of politicians and powerbrokers.

Afghan Finance Minister Omar Zakhilwal said the bulk of the $4 billion in cash that has been flown out of the nation in the past three and a half years is from huge contracts that the international community has given to large Afghan and foreign companies.

Zakhilwal also squared off against U.S. Representative Nita Lowey, who threatened this week to block billions of dollars in aid to Afghanistan until she was convinced that “U.S. taxpayer money is not being abused to line the pockets of corrupt Afghan government officials, drug lords and terrorists.”

He said Lowey, a Democrat from New York and chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the State Department’s budget, was wrong to suggest that the Afghan government officials had misused or pocketed donor funds.

“She is not accurate on the fact to blame the Afghan government for it because it had nothing to do with it,” Zakhilwal said, calling for a joint investigation with international partners into cash trafficking.

Zakhilwal, who is backed by the West, has acknowledged that there is graft and corruption in the Afghan government, especially in the delivery of government services. But he stressed that there are few, if any, examples of mismanagement of donors’ money by the Afghan government, which controls only a small percentage of the funds. His ministry says that since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion that toppled the Taliban, 77 percent of the $29 billion in international aid spent in Afghanistan has been disbursed on projects with little or no input from Afghan government officials.

“To relate the cash trafficking with corruption in the government of Afghanistan is baseless,” Zakhilwal said. “We strongly believe that the bulk of this money is from the huge contracts that our international partners have given out directly to big companies, particularly private security companies, without any involvement from the Afghan government.”

Corruption was a topic of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s brief visit to Afghanistan.

A statement released by Karzai’s office said that the president complained to Holder in a meeting at the presidential palace that awarding contracts to government officials, political figures and parliamentarians was helping fuel the “negative phenomenon” of corruption in Afghanistan. Karzai said Holder indicated that the U.S. government planned to review and reform the contract process in Afghanistan.

“Giving contracts to such figures is a matter of concern for the Afghan government,” the statement said.

Karzai also complained that contracts were being awarded to private security firms, which he said undermined efforts to build a strong national army and police force.

America’s top prosecutor said the U.S. commitment to help Afghanistan create a fair court system and fight terrorism, corruption and drug trafficking would outlast any foreign military presence in the country. He encouraged Karzai to continue efforts to improve governance and law enforcement “as much work remains to be done.”

In his meeting at the palace, Holder also met with Afghan Attorney General Mohammad Ishaq Aloko who on Tuesday defended himself against allegations that he’s being pressured not to pursue cases against powerful figures. Aloko also accused U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry of overstepping his diplomatic authority by suggesting that he step down as attorney general if he wasn’t going to charge an Afghan banker in a corruption case.

Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for Eikenberry, did not comment on the conversation, saying the ambassador’s discussions with Afghan officials were private.

Associated Press Writer Rahim Faiez in Kabul contributed to this report.

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :